0
Àá½Ã¸¸ ±â´Ù·Á ÁÖ¼¼¿ä. ·ÎµùÁßÀÔ´Ï´Ù.

Ç¥ÁØÈ­ ȯÀÚ¸¦ È°¿ëÇÑ ÀÓ»ó¼öÇà´É·Â Æò°¡¹æ¹ý °³¹ß ¹× Àû¿ëÈ¿°ú: º¹ºÎ¼ö¼ú ÈÄ È¯ÀÚ°£È£

Effects and Development of Clinical Competency Evaluation using Standardized Patients among Nursing Students: Based on Abdominal Surgical Patients

¼ºÀΰ£È£ÇÐȸÁö 2009³â 21±Ç 5È£ p.468 ~ 476
KMID : 0367020090210050468
¼®¼ÒÇö ( Sok So-Hyune ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ °£È£°úÇдëÇÐ

°­Çö¼÷ ( Kang Hyun-Sook ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ °£È£°úÇдëÇÐ
±è¿ø¿Á ( Kim Won-Ock ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ °£È£°úÇдëÇÐ
Çö°æ¼± ( Hyun Kyung-Sun ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ °£È£°úÇдëÇÐ
ÀÌÁö¾Æ ( Lee Ji-A ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ °£È£°úÇдëÇÐ
¹Ú¼±Èñ ( Park Sun-Hee ) - °æÈñ´ëÇб³ °£È£°úÇдëÇÐ

Abstract

Purpose: This study was to develop the clinical competency evaluation, and to examine the effects of the developed evaluation by comparing it with existing evaluation on clinical competency, communication skill, and self-efficacy of nursing students.

Methods: Design was a randomized control group post-test design. The subjects were 102 senior nursing students(Experimental group: 48, Control group: 54) at K university in seoul, Korea. The experimental group took the clinical competency evaluation using standardized patients and the control group took the existing evaluation using a doll. The clinical competency and communication skills were measured by evaluators, and self-efficacy was self reported by the nursing students.

Results: The experimental group had higher scores in clinical competency, communication skills, and self-efficacy than those in the control group.

Conclusion: Through these results, practice education of nursing education programs need to activate the clinical competency evaluation using standardized patients.
KeyWords
Ç¥ÁØÈ­ ȯÀÚ, ¼ö¼ú
Competency, Surgery, Nursing, Students
¿ø¹® ¹× ¸µÅ©¾Æ¿ô Á¤º¸
 
µîÀçÀú³Î Á¤º¸
ÇмúÁøÈïÀç´Ü(KCI) KoreaMed